What people are saying

Every public comment filed on TxDOT's Round 3 comment map, 315 of them, searchable and grouped by the route each one sits in.

Whose comments these are

These come from I_14_Public_Comments, the service behind TxDOT's own comment map, so they are already public record. 199 of the 315 were filed from a point inside one of the conceptual corridors; the rest are tagged with the nearest route and how far away it is.

Only the comment text is here. Commenter names, street addresses, phone numbers and email addresses are never requested, and the text is additionally scrubbed for phone and email patterns typed into the prose. The upstream service does return all of those fields to anyone who asks — this site does not ask. See About.

• inside C3, C4, C5

  This is too close to neighborhoods and other farmland. We do not want to see a busy large road be built.

• inside W3

  This is wiping out too many homes along FM 2095.

• inside C1, C2, C4

  This area is in a 100 year flood plain and building a road through here with highly disrupt wildlife habitat and homesteads. I don’t understand the need to build right along the river as the Brazos rivers edges vary lightly to drastically year to year.

• nearest W1 · 4.3 mi

  LEAVE FM 2095 ALONE! I grew up here and we don’t need this farm land torn up!

• inside W3, W4

  This is Red Mountain (also called Sugarloaf Mountain). It is owned by theTonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma. The Tonkawa believe this is where their tribe originated hundreds or thousands of years ago. They have purchased it recently to preserve it as an important part of their culture. They hold powwows on the site and expect to develop it into an open public park.

• nearest C3 · 0.4 mi

  No I14

• inside E1, E2, E3

  New construction home and acreage for family. 4 adjacent neighbors.

• nearest C1 · 0.6 mi

  I strongly oppose this I14 route, it is not something we want or need. I do not want to live next to a noisy interstate or have my property devalued because of it

• inside E3

  The path that makes the most sense is the one that goes south of Iola, but north of Kurten (across Democrat Rd & Fickey Rd). There is NO need for a 214 loop - at all.

• inside C3, C4, C5

  Historic Cemetery please don't destroy

• inside C3, C4, C5

  Historic cemetery please don't destroy

• inside C3, C6

  Historic cemetery please don't destroy

• inside C3, C4, C5

  Historic Kurten cotton gin please don't destroy

• nearest C3 · 0.2 mi

  Historic Zion Church of Kurten please don't destroy

• inside C1, C2, C6

  I live in King Oaks. Not directly underneath the eastern option of the loop, but close enough. This overlaps roughly 60 beautiful homes in our neighborhood. The proposed road measures about 1 mile on top of King Oaks. Giving each home a $700k average market price, that makes this single mile of road sit on top of roughly 42 million in real estate and, of course, completely destroys the tranquility for the other half of the neighborhood.

• inside C1, C4, C5

  We are against all proposed routes for the I-14 corridor in the Brazos Valley area

• inside C3, C4, C5, E1

  This land has been in mu husband's family since the 1930's. It was used to farm cotton and currently used for hay production, wildlife, and raising cattle. Please do not put I-14 over/around our property as it would destroy the land, wildlife and OUR LIFE. We build our forever home here as we thought it would be. We love our country living, away from town and traffic.

• nearest C5 · 0.0 mi

  No this runs through most of my small homestead destroying what I just purchased.

• inside E4

  This is my house. Does this mean I might loose my home to imminent domain?

• nearest W3 · 1.5 mi

  test

• inside W1, W2, W5

  West Conceptual Alternative Route 2 is preferred as it passes to the west of Hearne Municipal Airport and may bring some interest to the airport which is looking at improvements.

• inside C1, C5, C6

  These are our three houses and farming headquarters. This takes in our farm land, our livelihood, and housing for our workers. We don’t need this interstate with all the improvements already being made on Hwy 21.

• inside C3, C4, C5

  DO NOT BUILD HERE PLEASE. This is my home, I have a family and a bunch of high fence animals- MANY baby animals and a TON of wildlife documented with an exemption, you would be killing SO many animals and their home. OUR home is here.

• inside C3, C4, C5

  We have a bunch of animals and Wildlife. We do not want this here!

• inside C2, C3, C6

  I am the President of the Henry Peyton Cemetery Association and we are squarely in the path of the proposed loops of I-214 as well as in the grey area for I-14. We are a designated state historical site with citizens of the Republic of Texas buried here. We are also still and active cemetery with current burials. The cemetery has been in place since 1838. It sits on property to be effected by the project that has been in our family since 1837. I understand commenting here is really pointless but in the end it is a way to vent a little. With progress and money to be made by so many we can never stand in the way. In addition to the cemetery we live on the land and I lives are certainly in for major changes. We will fight, but we will lose, this I understand, but I will still fight to my dyin

• nearest C2 · 0.1 mi

  We are against all proposed routes going through this area. Not only is this our home where we cherish country life with our 3 young children, but our business is here and depends on having pasture land. We will not only lose our livelihood, but our business is also an asset to the State of Texas for conservation of wildlife and you will be destroying that.

• nearest C3 · 0.1 mi

  I am against any of these route suggestions. This land has been in my family for 70 years and our cattle business relies on pasture that you are threatening to take away. This is a terrible idea.

• nearest C5 · 0.0 mi

  This route is non-sensical and essentially seeks to destroy the entirety of the BCS country area for a false sense of improvement. This is just a copy paste of the poor "improvements" that became nightmares for the public in Houston and Dallas. Not only would this destroy the livelihoods of thousands of land owners, it always destroys the habits of thousands of rare wild animals, pasture stock, and insect pollinators. It also would run through wetlands and the 100yr flood plain in some places, which is nonsensical as well. BCS doesn't need a loop that destroys everything in its path just to try and be like Houston or some other big city. More effort needs to be put into a corridor that actually makes sense. The is a low effort carbon copy route.

• inside C3, C4, C5

  The proposed road alignment would have a significant and lasting impact on the existing City of Kurten by effectively dividing the community in half lengthwise. Placing a major roadway through the center of the current city would create a physical barrier between neighborhoods, businesses, and other community resources that are currently connected. This could disrupt established traffic patterns, reduce accessibility between the two sides of the city, and negatively affect the character and cohesion of the existing community. Rather than placing the road through the heart of the current city, alternative alignments further east or closer to Bryan should be carefully considered that provide the necessary transportation connection while minimizing the disruption to established neighborhoods

• nearest E3 · 0.7 mi

  I don't think the route through Iola would be a good idea, because it would take a lot of money to clear and create a road versus merging the I-14 with a road that is already created and you could even put some of the money into making that road better.

• nearest C2 · 1.4 mi

  Loop 214 is not necessary and is a tremendous waste of taxpayer money. Build Interstate 14 on the northern route and not use Hwy 30. The cost of property aquisition, engineering and concrete would be saved. Land developers must be the folks are pushing the loop project along with Brazos County for their benefit while surrounding rural county residents suffer all the pain of the loop project. Existing roadways can be used to travel between I-14 and Bryan/College Station.

• nearest C2 · 0.5 mi

  The proposed plan would wreak havoc on King Oaks. KO is in essence a sleepy retirement community. It's our designated place to live out the remainder of our earthly days. The proposed route would devastate and ruin our peaceful subdivision. Progress is necessary. Destroying our lifestyles and the environment with traffic and noise is not progress. Please pursue other options that don't jeopardize King Oaks.

• nearest E4 · 0.3 mi

  Will FM 244 be widened between TX30 and new interstate?

• inside E1, E2, E3

  Group of residential houses and equine ranch

• inside C4, C6

  If at all consider placing road as far north as you can for the “Central Conceptual Alternative Route 5” along county road 443 as to not disrupt the multiple residential lots and families living on that road. There is more land and less homes if you focus on the northern edge of that route.

• nearest E3 · 0.3 mi

  Utilize the current HWY30, HWY90 South of Gibbons Creek Reservoir and the HWY21 project structures. instead of building directly through the town of Iola.

• inside E1, E2, E3

  Do not destroy the town of Iola. Make the HWY go south of Gibbons Creek Reservoir crossing HWY30 and HWY90 since that area is expecting growth. Or utilize HWY21 and continue developing what is already being planned.

• inside W3

  I don't think McLane would like for the State of Texas to go right thru his property.

• inside E1, E2, E3

  Please do not destroy the town of Iola. Expanding or putting in I-14 crossing Hwy 30 and Hwy90 on the South side of Space X property will help that area way more in growth and needed infrastructure.

• inside W3

  Deeded family cemetery

• inside C3, C5

  The I-14 corridor seems to follow the Navasota River, which is almost the only remaining native area for wildlife in Eastern Brazos Valley. Additionally the logistics of building in and thru the floodplain would be extremely difficult and expensive. Moving the I-14 corridor slightly east (east of the SpaceX Gibbons Creek facility, and more towards Shiro connects the Anderson Shiro Community and the 30 corridor, around and up to 21 west of Madisonville. Utilizing Rock Prairie Road and Peach Creek Road involves several neighborhoods (Lick Crossing and Peach Creek Crossing). From Westward Ho I would suggest the corridor move eastward and go west of Shiro rather than along riverbottom.

• inside E4

  Incorporate tunneling, like Interstate H-3 in Hawaii, where economically and technically feasible, including technologies developed by The Boring Company, to minimize surface disruption, conserve rural land, and improve transportation and infrastructure efficiency.

• nearest C1 · 9.8 mi

  What area of Caldwell will this affect? This is farm land and new developments are in this zone. Have property owners been contacted? Has the economic impact been studied for small towns that will be bypassed due to this proposed “loop”.

• inside W3

  All of this one mile area is flood plane. Routes 1 & 2 make more sense to avoid this type of lowlands.

• nearest W5 · 2.0 mi

  Sugarloaf/Red Mountain is Native American land belonging to the Tonkawa Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma. Red Mountain is the orgin land of their tribe. Historical artificats for Native Americans are all through this area. This land should not be disturbed.

• inside W3, W4

  Pertaining to Route 3 – Do not use this route. Long Mountain is within a study area of the Texas Archeological Society. This mountain and other surrounding areas appear to have been inhabited by Native Americans. This mountain is located just east of Sugarloaf/Red Mountain owned by the Tonkawa Indians.

• nearest C3 · 1.5 mi

  Lick Creek Park is "The Crown Jewel of College Station's Park System" according to the City's own website. It is home to many migratory and seasonal birds that are vital to the local ecosystem. The park is also home to a native plant found on the endangered species list. The Navasota Ladies' Trusses. The City of College Station received a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Section 6 Recovery Grant to purchase property along Alum Creek in Brazos County where the Navasota ladies’ tresses were known to occur. This property is now part of the city’s Lick Creek Nature Center. This area played a large part on why decided to build in this location. This loop serves no benefit to anyone on this side of the city. Use one of the other routes.

• inside W3

  I am here tonight because this proposed route is not simply a line on a map to my family—it would run through my living room. This is the home I have worked for, sacrificed for, and put my life savings into. It is the place my children have grown up in and the place they call home. It represents years of hard work, stability, memories, and everything I have invested in building a life for my family. I understand that roads and infrastructure are important, and I understand that growth requires difficult decisions. But those decisions have real consequences for the families who live along these proposed routes. For my family, this isn't an abstract project or a transportation plan. It is our home. I am asking those making this decision to look beyond the lines on a map and consider the p

• inside C1, C2, C4

  The southern alternative crosses Seven Eleven Ranches, an established rural residential subdivision along Westward Ho. The corridor contains occupied homes and developed residential properties rather than undeveloped agricultural acreage. I ask that TxDOT document the number of residential parcels and potential residential displacements associated with this alternative and evaluate opportunities to shift the corridor away from the existing neighborhood.

• inside C2, C3, C6

  There is not enough of a population, residential or business, to justify the expense of building a loop over here. It shows the loop going into Burleson county and down Highway 50, taking away valuable farm land.

• inside E4

  I strongly oppose Route #4 of the East Conceptual Alternatives for the I-14 Central Texas Corridor because it would require the acquisition of our home and property in Shiro and force our family to start over. We intentionally moved to this area to escape the congestion, traffic, noise, and rapid development surrounding Houston and found what we consider our forever home. Here we raise cattle and chickens, farm crops, hunt, manage wildlife, and teach our two sons how to care for animals, work the land, hunt responsibly, and respect the outdoors. This property represents years of work, investment, and family memories. Losing it cannot be addressed simply by paying for the land. With the increasing cost of rural acreage, homes, construction materials, fencing, agricultural improvements, and

• inside C2, C3, C4

  This is a completely unwanted and unneeded project for the Brazos Valley. The proposed routes for the I214 loop on the west side of Bryan is not a high density area for population and businesses.

• inside E5

  This proposed route would cut my family’s property in half. We are also mid construction on the exact area where this proposed route would be. The state would be doing a disservice to its constituents in this area if they continue with this plan.

• inside W3

  This route would directly affect my home and more than half of the families living on our road. Many of us have invested years of work and resources into our properties, and this alignment could result in displacement, loss of property value, and significant disruption to our daily lives.

• inside W3

  This route would directly affect my home and more than half of the families living on our road. Many of us have invested years of work and resources into our properties, and this alignment could result in displacement, loss of property value, and significant disruption to our daily lives.

• nearest W3 · 0.1 mi

  Coxes Providence Cemetery - African American Cemetery associated with Coxes Providence Church

• inside W3

  This is an official Family Cemetery. It has my Father, Grandfather, Grandmother and my Aunt's Mother buried there. I would really appreciate not having to go through and put my mother through the trauma of digging up their bodies and finding another place to lay them to rest.

• inside C1, C2, C6

  I strongly oppose the proposed TxDOT loop around Bryan-College Station. This project would have a devastating impact on my family and countless others in our community. My wife and I served our country for decades in the United States Army. For more than 30 years, we worked, saved, and planned for our retirement dream: a home where we could finally settle down and enjoy the life we had earned through years of sacrifice and service. We moved into that home on March 1, 2025. Now, we are being told that this proposed loop may run directly through our property, threatening to take away the home we just completed and the future we spent a lifetime building. After reviewing many of the public comments submitted by other residents, it is clear that my family is far from alone. This project thre

• inside W1, W4

  This route makes the most sense with all of the data center and solar farm traffic in the area. It would also help correct deadly traffic issues along a congested 485.

• inside W3, W5

  This route would require rail modifications that other routes would not. That is an added expense that is not necessary because there are other options. Also, the construction traffic for the data centers will be north of here, so route 1 seems like it would be more ideal for that traffic.

• inside C1, C2, C6

  I can't believe you are prepared to destroy King Oaks, this beautiful place to live. I'm sure 45 to 50 million dollars in homes will be destroyed. Those that reman will be signicantly devalued. Elon Musk's business will pay no county or Iola School District tax. Grimes county will lose much of its tax base as King Oaks provides a significant portion of the taxes. Please reconsider your plan for I-14 .

• nearest C1 · 0.3 mi

  OBJECT! The blue area takes in a portion of my acreage. The yellow dashed area involves the remainder of my acreage. The proposed areas involve lands once occupied by the Caddo (prehistoric) and Cherokee. Relics and artifacts continue to be located along the banks and further inward where they built their camp grounds. The land is home to coastal live oaks which have been dated to 400-500 years old. We farm and ranch this land for our livelihood and it is the major source of our income. I strenuously object to theses proposed areas and find it un-necessary to encompass any of my land this far from Brazos County. There are many options that could be utilized better than that of taking farmland and its resources.

• inside C1, C2, C6

  I am highly opposed to any highway corridor close enough to the King Oaks development off of Hwy 30 and CR175 that could negatively impact EITHER property value OR quality of life, (e.g. noise).

• inside C3, C5, C6

  John Graves wrote a book in 1960 called “Goodbye to a River,” detailing his experiences on the Brazos river before it was meant to be damned 13 times between Possum Kingdom and Lake Whitney. The success of his book prompted only 1 damn to be built (Granbury). The west side of this loop looks like it’ll destroy this part of the Brazos. Are we going to have to do this again?

• inside W1, W4

  Routes are not allowed to interfere with SOLAR FARMS. If that is true RTE 4 is not a viable alternative.

• nearest C1 · 1.2 mi

  I support the need for improved regional transportation and recognize the importance of I-14, but I strongly object to an alignment that unnecessarily displaces and existing home and business and fragments an active agricultural operation when alternative corridors may accomplish the same transportation objectives with substantially less impact to established residences, businesses, and productive agricultural land.

• nearest E4 · 0.1 mi

  Bunch of residential homes and family farms on this proposed route north of Shiro.

• nearest C5 · 0.1 mi

  I support the need for improved regional transportation and recognize the importance of I-14, but I strongly object to an alignment that unnecessarily displaces and existing home and business and fragments an active agricultural operation when alternative corridors may accomplish the same transportation objectives with substantially less impact to established residences, businesses, and productive agricultural land.

• nearest C2 · 0.2 mi

  I support the need for improved regional transportation and recognize the importance of I-14, but I strongly object to an alignment that unnecessarily displaces and existing home and business and fragments an active agricultural operation when alternative corridors may accomplish the same transportation objectives with substantially less impact to established residences, businesses, and productive agricultural land.

• nearest C5 · 0.1 mi

  I support the need for improved regional transportation and recognize the importance of I-14, but I strongly object to an alignment that unnecessarily displaces an existing home and business and fragments an active agricultural operation when alternative corridors may accomplish the same transportation objectives with substantially less impact to established residences, businesses, and productive agricultural land.

• inside C3, C4, C5

  Makes no sense to jog south through areas with homes and productive hay and cattle production when the area north of this is much less densely populated. Please don't destroy our community. Go north.

• inside C2

  Objected. Why is this necessary?

• inside C2

  Object. Considering taking a home equity loan out for property improvements and with the threat of imminent domain, this is like waiting for cancer spread.

• inside C2

  Object

• nearest E4 · 0.0 mi

  We strongly oppose Route #4 of the East Conceptual Alternatives for the I-14 Central Texas Corridor. Route #4 would require the acquisition of our home and property in Shiro, resulting in the loss of our residence, displacement from our community, and significant harm to our livelihood and quality of life. Route #5 is the preferred alternative because it is the shortest route and utilizes a substantial portion of existing US 190, an already established highway corridor. Using existing infrastructure would minimize impacts on homes, property owners, and rural communities while still achieving the project's transportation objectives. We respectfully urge decision-makers to eliminate Route #4 from consideration and select Route #5 as the preferred alternative.

• inside W3, W4

  So while I understand and support the need for infrastructure improvements to support a growing population here in Central Texas, like many others, I would like to be minimally impacted by it. I know that is selfish of me (like everyone else). We own 13 ac here in Milam Co, and while that may not be a lot to some, this is, in so many ways, this is my dream come true. I do not come from wealth, my family does not own land, so I have had to work my butt off just to have the opportunity to be able to borrow money from a bank to finance my dream. Being admittedly selfish, I would prefer the western route to go down 485 as opposed to 79. However, if y'all do decide to go down 79, please don't hit me with a glancing blow. I would prefer that you just go ahead and run it right thru the midd

• nearest E4 · 0.1 mi

  Existing home and business Honeybee Hill LLC (road is CR229, not CR240)

• inside C1, C2, C3, C5, C6

  So this is my place of business. I have worked here for 25 years, but our business has been around for over 50 years. We are an ag retail outfit that supplies seed, chemicals and fertilizer to the farmers and ranchers in the Brazos Valley. A large portion of our business comes from right here in the Brazos River Bottom, and a large portion of that business is between 21 and 60. This is our little breadbasket and we are very passionate about what we do and the producers that we work with. This bottom is my second home. It's also the means by which I pay the bank for my first home (see comment 101). I love this land and I love these farmers and I want to make damn sure that these guys are able to continue to farm in the bottom. We are losing farm and ranch land at a massive rate every

• nearest E4 · 0.3 mi

  Historical site: Independence Church and Independence Cemetery is a historic burial ground located in Grimes County, Texas, specifically situated on County Road 229 near Shiro and Bedias. The cemetery contains 310 graves with burial dates ranging from 1862 to 2012 and was designated as a Historic Texas Cemetery by the Texas Historical Commission on October 22, 2015.

• inside E4

  Midway Baptist Church

• nearest C2 · 0.6 mi

  Keep this monstrosity as far away from King Oaks as possible. Between this and Terafab, this state is proving over and over that they do not care for the people and families and rural areas. This is an absolute waste of money and would push so many people out of their homes and destroy quality of life for the rest. This is a hard no from me.

• nearest C6 · 7.1 mi

  Build high speed rail from Dallas to Houston through Bryan/College Station instead of this waste

• nearest C3 · 6.3 mi

  Why don't you improve safety instead of all these highway widening boondoggles that we can't afford to maintain?

• inside E2

  Why are both of the 214 East options routed directly through the Navasota River bottomlands and floodplain? WIth all the coming development and the resulting flood control issues that will inevitably arise, it makes little sense to purposefully impede river floodlands. It also creates the highest environmental impact, and potentially pollutes a key water source. Moving the eastern side of 214 to the east, around FM244, avoids interfering with floodways, avoids multiple neighborhoods, and provides direct access to the Gibbons Creek development, thereby removing commercial traffic from local areas, which is a key aim of 214.

• inside C3, C4, C5

  I understand the reasons and needs presented for I-14, however I have not found any evidence in any of the I-14 studies that supports the need for the loop I-214. My wife and I moved to the Bryan/College Station area in 2021 from Plano to enjoy the peace that the Brya/College Station and Brazos County provides to Texans. We wanted a small piece of Texas land and residence to establish a legacy for our children and grandchildren for my years to come. Thus, selfishly, I am opposed to the loop I-214. Now, objectively and stated previously, there is no evidence that supports the need for this loop other than a mention in the Bryan/College Station 2050 plan. There was an attempt to begin executing this plan of a loop, characterized as the East loop, in 2024/2025 but was formally voted down

• inside W3, W4

  This property (Property id: 202501209 is a Family Land Heritage Farm having been owned by the same family for over 100 years.

• inside W3, W4

  This is a historical home that is being preserved. It is over 100 years old.

• inside W3, W4

  This is a historial home, it is over 70 years old and it is being preserved.

• inside C1, C2, C6, E2

  A SpaceX subsidiary called Wit Tech LLC owns this piece of property and another about half a mile to the west at the end of Roese Road at the Navasota River. The property here has a pump station on it which connects the upcoming Terafab location to the Navasota river. I would imagine they are going to object to this route. If you won't alter it for the residents who live here, do it for Elon.

• inside C1, C4, C5

  This is both unnecessary and unwanted by the general public

• nearest E3 · 0.2 mi

  Please use Hwy 30 to connect to the loop. Do not destroy our town.

• nearest E1 · 0.2 mi

  Use the South side of HWY30 to build. Don’t take our town please

• nearest E3 · 0.7 mi

  We just passed a multi million dollar bond. A HWY through Iola would destroy our school and town. Please consider using HWY30 or hwy21 as the proposed route for I-14.

• inside W1, W4

  Flood

• inside W1, W4

  Flood

• inside W1, W4

  Cemetary

• inside W2

  Flood

• inside C1, C2, C6

  This is our house! Using this route option you will take my house and split this neighborhood. Instead of taking our houses and properties why don't you consider expanding roadways and routes that currently exist such as Highway 30 or Fitch? Who is driving the effort to destroy an established community and what gain are they obtaining? Be completely transparent! Of course, you will depress property values for an eventual imminent domain play through a 20 year advanced property condemnation.

• inside W1, W4

  Texas Birding Classic Recorded Study Site

• inside W1, W4

  North Elm Historical Community Over 100 year old Farmhouse and Outbuildings

• nearest W4 · 0.2 mi

  Flood MAJOR

• inside W1, W4

  North Elm Community School Historic Site (previous)

• inside C1, C2, C6

  It makes no sense to us that alternate path 2 cuts across both our property and a significant footprint of the King Oaks neighborhood. Why would even a preliminary model include possible destruction of one of the largest and most valued BCS area neighborhoods? We don't want to over-react or get ahead of ourselves at this stage but TxDOT has chosen to put it out there that our community is potentially in play for the loop development, and so we have to respond. Aside from the stress caused by uncertainty, so long as this is hanging out there, buying, selling or building homes in our community becomes compromised and may even grind to a halt. Given this, the planning decision timeline which we understand is 3 years, is too long for King Oaks home owners to know where we stand. Ask is for yo

• inside W2

  Indian Artifacts

• nearest W2 · 0.2 mi

  Indian Artifacts

• inside W2

  Texas Birding Classic Migratory Bird Study Site

• nearest W2 · 0.1 mi

  Great Egret Multiple Nest Sites along Creek

• inside W2, W3, W5

  Wetland

• inside W1, W2, W4, W5

  Absolutely. I would make it specific, factual, and focused on the impact to your residence, rather than sounding emotional or making a demand for compensation at this stage. You want your concern documented in TxDOT’s record. I-14 Public Comment – FM 485 / CR 247 Our residence and property are located near the intersection of FM 485 and CR 247 and appear to be directly within one of the proposed I-14 corridor alternatives. We strongly oppose an alignment that would place I-14 through or immediately adjacent to our property and residence. This is an established rural residential and horse property, and the proposed alignment would fundamentally change the character and use of our property. In addition to the potential loss of property, an interstate immediately adjacent to our home would

• inside C1, C2, C6

  With the growth of BCS and now Terafab coming, why wouldn't you push the loop out bigger than the 2 proposed loops? This also avoids ruining King Oaks!

• inside W1, W2, W4, W5

  I-14 Public Comment – FM 485 / CR 247 Our residence and property are located near the intersection of FM 485 and CR 247 and appear to be directly within one of the proposed I-14 corridor alternatives. We strongly oppose an alignment that would place I-14 through or immediately adjacent to our property and residence. This is an established rural residential and horse property, and the proposed alignment would fundamentally change the character and use of our property. In addition to the potential loss of property, an interstate immediately adjacent to our home would create significant concerns regarding traffic noise, headlights, privacy, safety, access, visual impact, and the overall loss of the quiet rural environment that currently exists. Our property includes our residence, horse fa

• nearest C2 · 1.2 mi

  We built our home in 2024 in an established acreage neighborhood (King Oaks). This proposal will destroy a large portion of the homes and lots right in the center of our neighborhood. We are about 1 mile from the proposed roadway, so are likely to have severely decreased property value and quality of life in our home. We specifically chose this area because of the natural beauty, abundant wildlife and quiet lifestyle. I understand that development is sometimes necessary, but there is ample undeveloped land in our area. Please find another route that does not completely destroy our neighborhood

• nearest C2 · 0.1 mi

  Thi is a place of worship- King Oaks Fellowship

• inside C3, C4, C5, E4

  Thank you for the opportunity to provide public comment regarding the proposed TxDOT project and its potential impact on Lake Louise. Our family has owned Lake Louise for approximately three decades. We did not simply acquire and maintain an existing lake. We designed, engineered, and built Lake Louise specifically for three-event competitive waterskiing. From its inception, the property was intentionally created to meet the highly specialized requirements of competitive waterskiing. Facilities of this nature are exceptionally rare. There are only a limited number of purpose-built competitive waterski lakes in the United States, and a facility with the design, engineering, history, and capabilities of Lake Louise cannot simply be replaced by another body of water. For more than thirty y

• inside C3, C5

  This alternative is too Close to Lick Creek Park. Any option further away from Lick Creek Park would be more acceptable.

• nearest C3 · 3.8 mi

  Hwy 30 to FM2038 is a route to be considered

• nearest C3 · 1.3 mi

  We support they FM 2038 alignment for loop 214

• nearest W3 · 0.1 mi

  Route 1 (northernmost) seems most direct for highway traffic. There is no real economic benefit for coming closer to Buckholts and Cameron. Route 3 (southernmost) least sense when considering the number of county roads and driveways off FM 2095. Building access roads in this area would be wasteful and unneeded.

• inside C1, C2, C6

  This option cuts through a large swath of King Oaks neighborhood. Please choose a different route. Lots of recently built homes in this area.

• nearest C2 · 0.0 mi

  This Proposed study area is where my home of 10years sits, having interstate loop that destroys a rural development doesn't make sense to me. Even if where a mile a way it will have a negative impact on my property value, I would rather see this project further west where there are less homes afected.

• nearest C3 · 0.1 mi

  I am concerned that the proposed Loop I-214 would be constructed within the Navasota River floodplain, where it could disrupt natural drainage, increase flood risks, create environmental impacts, and result in higher construction and maintenance costs. I am also concerned about the effects of placing a major highway close to existing homes and rural properties, including increased noise, light pollution, traffic, and loss of the area's rural character. I encourage TxDOT to consider alternative alignments that avoid floodplain areas and reduce impacts on nearby residents and landowners.

• inside C1, C2

  This is my forever home and claimed homestead, business, and farm/ranch. We are a family of five, with three young children. This property has been in the family for over a century.

• inside C1, C2

  I own a 38 acre ranch with cattle and do not want to sell. I am building my home here after my house in Houston sells.

• inside W1, W2, W4

  I have had the pleasure of living here for a few years now. There has been a MASSIVE uptick in traffic, industrial traffic not associated with the new Data Center. in conjunction with the daily (it seems) head on collisions and or wreaks you have got to do something to mitigate this traffic ASAP. Its almost negligence on TxDOT part at this point.

• inside W1, W2, W4

  I believe, and with the traffic pattern data, contextual development and infrastructure already in place the best place to "develop"" that has already been overtaken by the new "solar" installs would be the route in the West Opportunity zone that cuts through Glaser Field its natural terrain and the isolated broad acreage are prime candidate for this type of development. Impacting very few and benefiting the broader community

• inside E1

  Consider moving connection of East to Central to following existing CR 162 just south of this alignment. I support the 2038 alignment over the proposed Central alignment to the north. Keep proposed as close as possible to existing TxDOT ROW. There will be big hydraulic and wetland impacts crossing the Navasota, a requirement should be to provide mitigation within watershed. Habitat includes fresh water mussels, alligator snapping turtles, otters ect.

• inside C3, C6

  This route takes my whole place. I'm a third generation cattle operator and my residence is here. Putting a highway would severely impact my way of life. My past family and I have put a lot of blood,sweat, and money into this place to make it what it is today.

• inside C3, C4, C5

  This land has been in our family 3 generations. We have grew up here, fishing, farming, raising animals and our children - And definitely change our way of life as we have all grew up to know.

• nearest W1 · 0.4 mi

  This route goes through many homes and valuable ranch properties as well as our creek and cemetery. Have you bought any of this land?

• inside C1, C2, C6

  To TxDOT and all your cronies: Why in God's name would you even think to propose a freeway through our neighborhood in King Oaks? Eminent domain is a hard and bitter pill for anyone to swallow but your proposition for the western portion of the loop to cut through our homes is verging on inhumane. These are our homes, our sanctuaries, our retirement. How would you like it if a freeway was literally proposed on a fuzzy map drawn through your back yard? It's unsettling to say the least. Most of us are retired people in King Oaks but there are young families that have moved here recently and all of our lives are to be severely, irrevocably disrupted by this route. Our tax base has helped Grimes along for many years and although that probably garners no favors from anyone, our loyalty to

• nearest C3 · 0.4 mi

  Object

• nearest C3 · 0.4 mi

  object

• inside W1, W2, W4, W5

  My family has lived here for decades and have built a place to be proud of and handed down for generations to come. A lot of blood sweat and tears have gone into building this place and my parents place next door. The thought that all this could simply be taken away from us is absolutely absurd. We have had generations grow up on this property and raise cattle here. we strongly and I mean Strongly oppose any route coming through or near our property. Three of the opposed routes would completely take over the entire 160 acres of our family’s property and places we call home. The mere thought of our life and homes being taken away to route a highway through the area is devastating. Again, my family and I STRONGLY oppose any route that would take our homes and property away from us.

• inside E4

  Reroute to the south of independence Dr. or along hwy 30. Lots of homes here and new homes are already being built.

• nearest C2 · 0.9 mi

  Prefer a route that doesn't come too close to our family land here. Seems best for it to run along the Navasota River as an elevated road in the flood plain so it disturbs the least amount of homes & businesses.

• inside C1, C2, C6

  For the king oaks subdivision, the loop placement needs to be as near as possible to the Navasota River, to minimize impacts to our subdivision, and our homes.

• nearest W3 · 0.1 mi

  Cemetary

• nearest C1 · 1.2 mi

  I think that instead of tearing through peoples properties and homes and ranches, you should look at how to increase the size of the existing roads and improving that infrastructure as an alternative. Widen OSR, widen 974, widen Dick Elliot, Widen 2776. This is less impactful on families and ranches and I would assume would get less push back. . Make it easier to transit through the existing.

• inside C3, C4, C5

  I spent almost 50 years working for the Government, 24 years in the Air Force and 22 years as a Govt contractor. I came home to the College Station area where I was raised, to retire and live a good life in the country. I have a beautiful house, guest house, and barn surrounded by 24 acres of ranch land. This path would destroy everything I worked for. Please don't.

• inside C2

  Fully support development and need for infrastructure changes but this route would displace many homes and new neighborhoods that are already in development. If property is to be displaced fair prices and incentives for repurchase should be considered.

• nearest W5 · 74.5 mi

  Home with disabled veteran

• inside W1, W2, W3, W4, W5

  This is the Ruffino Farm, a highly product corn/cotton farm where I scout crops. It is farmed by a young man who has recently moved his young family to this river bottom to follow the foot steps of his father, grandfather, and great grandfather in the farming industry. Although I understand the need for improved transportation, there have to better alternatives than displacing a young family trying to follow the family tradition.

• inside W1, W2, W3, W4, W5

  This is the Perrone farm. A highly product corn/cotton farm cultivated by a large farm family who has been in the area since the early 1900's. Although I understand the need for improved transit, it should not displace the history and traditions of this farming region.

• inside W1, W2, W3, W4, W5

  This is the Stratta farm. It is a highly productive piece of farm land farmed by an individual who also works as a mechanic for surrounding farmers. He uses this lease land as a way to support his family. Although I understand the need for improved transit in the region, it should not be displace cash-rent farmers who are working hard to earn a living.

• inside W1, W2, W3, W4, W5

  This is the Big Farm. I scout corn/cotton here for a large farming family who has been in the area since the early 1900s. I agree that there is a need for improved transit across this state, but it should not effect the livelihoods and family history of this River Bottom..

• nearest W5 · 1.2 mi

  This is what we call the Home Place; the original farm a Sicilian family purchased pre-1900 and still owns and farms to this day. I sell inputs and scout corn and cotton for this family. I understand it'd be nice for someone to be able to get from Rogers to Huntsville quicker, but that shouldn't divide a farm that has been in a family for over 120 years.

• nearest W5 · 1.5 mi

  We call this Ludwig's, the The Loma. It is a highly productive piece of farm land where I scout crops and sell crop inputs for a living. I understand that East to West transit needs to improve across the greater region, but it shouldn't have impact a thriving business or production agricultural operation in this River Bottom.

• nearest W2 · 1.6 mi

  This is the Cash Farm. I scout crops here and it is farmed by a young man who just grew his second crop, following the footsteps of his father, grandfather, and great grandfather. It is a highly productive farm that can more than support this young man for the next 20-30 years, the same way hist ancestors made a living tending to the land. I understand the need for this project, but it should not so heavily impact those with productive agricultural careers ahead of them.

• nearest W4 · 1.9 mi

  This is what we call Ollie's, or SJD. I have helped my customers (a large Sicilian family) grow crops here for over a decade. Although improved transit projects are a necessity for a growing population, the payoff should not be ruining the livelihoods of local ag producers and ag input suppliers.

• nearest W2 · 2.3 mi

  This is the famous Wilson Farm. One of the largest, contiguous farms in the River Bottom dating back to the mid-1800's. Improving transit in Texas is important, however it should not be done without thinking about the history and tradition associated with many of these farms.

• nearest W2 · 3.1 mi

  This is the Watts Farm. It is a highly productive farm where I scout crops and supply crop inputs. Although improved transit will help the area, understand that it comes at the detriment of businesses and families that support and love these local farmers. Not to mention, tax-paying bussinesses and tax-paying families

• inside C1, C5

  This is the Astin Farm. It was recently leased out by a young man who left his successful job in Dallas to relocate and father his ancestors' roots in farming. He has worked to improve the land and his first crop was a successful one. Understand that this isn't just land, there are young people and old families that have put their livelihoods on the line to feed and clothe the American population; and hope they can make a little bit of money whilst doing so. This project can potentially crash these efforts.

• inside C1, C4, C5

  This location appears to be in the center of the 1 mile study area for Route 1 and Route 5. Obvious answer is for another route to be selected. That being stated, what are protections, compensation, timeline if this property is required for the project. Would the impact be minimal, maximum, somewhere in between? Would remaining property only be good for limited or special use? Presently it is a homestead. How would access to the property be addressed? I am concerned with the lack of local (Bryan/College Station) area advertising this event. I saw no mention on TV or radio. Strictly social media, work of mouth. Local utility is proposing a new transmission line and sent mailed notices to property owners that could potentially be affected. Why was this process not done for thi

• inside C3, C4, C5

  This is a location of a family cemetery.

• inside C3, C4, C5

  My family has built a home in this location, we have created a business in this location. We chose this location for the beauty of the land, the peacefulness of the county. We would not have spent money, time and effort to build what we have if we knew that it could be taken away from us for a loop or interstate to come and run through what we have worked so hard on.

• inside E4

  With terafab coming to this area, this makes the most sense. Highway 30 is already miserable to drive down due to the single lane and amount of garbage trucks up and down the road to get to the dump.

• inside C3, C4, C5

  This is all in the floodplain

• inside C3, C4, C5

  Kurten Cemetery.

• inside C1, C2, C6

  A lot of land that does not have a lot of homes that would decrease the impact on families.

• inside C3, C4, C5

  This is the location of a 30 year + rural mixed animal veterinary clinic. The business is privately owned as is the property on which it sits. The clinic is one of only a couple of veterinary clinics servicing large animal in Brazos county. Veterinary hospitals (especially large animal) were considered critical during covid and will remain so. Disruption to its strategic location or accessibility by rural farmers/ranchers would be detrimental to the greater Brazos valley herd health.

• inside C1, C4, C5

  We have worked very hard for 40 years to repair damage to this property and turn it into a beautiful conservation success. And now you want to pave it? NO NO NO!!!

• inside C1, C2, C6

  The proposed routing for I214 Loop that passes through the King Oaks neighborhood is completely unacceptable. This route would condem or replace at least 60 custom built homes with an average value of between $600,000 and $ 1,000,000. The route for I214 Loop needs to stay west of the Navasota River, in a low population area.

• inside C2

  My land is not for sale and will never be. Do not want an interstate anywhere near where I live for all the same reasons everybody else doesn't. This has been our home for 80 years. My mom was born here. It's where we have set up our lives and livelihoods, and chosen to raise our families and this road would do nothing to help or improve that, only harm.

• inside C3, C4, C5

  I strongly oppose any proposed I-214 alignment that would cut through or destroy the community of Kurten. Kurten is not simply a collection of properties on a map. It is a longstanding community with deep roots in Brazos County, dating back to the Civil War era. It has its own identity, history, families, churches, homes, businesses, and sense of community. A major interstate highway driven through the heart of Kurten could permanently divide that community and fundamentally change its character. I am not opposed to improving transportation or providing a future interstate connection around Bryan and College Station. I recognize that our region is growing and that additional transportation infrastructure will eventually be necessary. But if I-214 is intended to be an outer loop around B

• nearest C2 · 0.4 mi

  I simply don't understand why demolishing 60+ homes and disrupting so many lives in the King Oaks Subdivision would be considered when a lot of undeveloped land surrounding the area.

• nearest W3 · 1.4 mi

  My property is barely south of the original study and a bit further away from the current 1 mile wide path you are studying, so my issue is not with my property being involved. However, we bought this land years ago and built our retirement home on it for the rural ambiance and peace and quiet. Now, assuming you select a route just sourth of the Little River and generally along and north of FM 2095 you will negatively impact my property and effectively take away the reason we live here. I expect compensation should that be the case. I also have some general comments. It appears to me that you will be buyng a lot of land if you select the 2095 route. Seems wiser for you to select the FM 485 route to Hearne and then around Hearne on the west side. I also think the Hwy 36 route should be

• nearest C3 · 0.4 mi

  We live in a flood zone and have flooded each of the three years we have lived here. Also, down the road is the Kelly Burt gravel pit.

• nearest C3 · 4.6 mi

  Traffic study done for inner loop showed there is zero need for a loop either the inner or this 214 loop. The only reason it is being planned is because certain local politicians and builders want to line their pockets and develop/urbanize the rural county. The citizens of both cities do not want that to happen, and would not use this roadway. It would also serve no purpose for the I-14 project because where the loop goes there are no businesses. HWY 6 would get people to BCS quickly and efficiently. This is a multi-billion dollar project of waste. TxDOT needs to focus on needs not what greedy politicians and developers want.

• inside C1, C2, C3, C4, C5, C6

  DO NOT BUILD A LEVEE AND CALL IT A HIGHWAY. The bottom is not just open undeveloped land for a new highway. This area provides flood storage for the Brazos River. Do not build a levee and call it a highway. Learn from how IH10 improvements causes wide spread flooding in Southeast Texas. Any highway alignment to through the floodplain should be designed to have no adverse impact for local rainfall events and high river levels. This should be a very long bridge and not a raised earthen embankment that disconnects the river from its floodplain.

• nearest C2 · 1.4 mi

  Support Conceptual Alternative Route 5 for Interstate 14. Strongly against Conceptual Alternative Route 4 that uses Hwy 30 for Interstate 14. Also against Loop 214 route in Grimes County because it runs through King Oaks neighborhood.

• inside W1, W2, W4

  I strongly oppose any encroachment of this ranch. Possibility of loosing the entire property sickens me. A lifetime of blood sweat and tears have been poured into what was to be a lasting legacy. To loose what one has labored for their entire life to a highway. Infrastructure is needed but at what cost? I am not willing going to give up this dream of living here. Please do not take small ranches and farms.

• nearest C2 · 1.4 mi

  TXDOT publishing a Loop 214 route through King Oaks neigborhood is devaluing all properties. How soon can this route be eliminated from consideration?

• inside W2

  Objectid

• nearest W2 · 0.0 mi

  Everything south of 2269 in this area is decently lower than the road itself, when it rains water stands and it's a nasty quagmire, if I 14 would come thru here it would require building up to the height of 2269 or higher, routes 4 and 5 are more logical in that sense

• nearest C3 · 0.2 mi

  Though not in favor of any of this, I would humbly suggest that you please consider the Central Conceptual Alternative Route 2 as well as the East Route 3. This seems to have the least impact on homes and neighborhoods in the area.

• nearest C3 · 5.5 mi

  Messina Hof Vineyard is an Agritourism destination attraction for Bryan-College Station. It is important to retain as much as possible the rural quiet environment. Our concern is how these study presentations shift suddenly like last time when suddenly it was coming through our Vineyard. We have rural style housing developments with at least one acre. The concern is commercial, industrial, and high density that would develop along the highway and connecting corridors like Old Reliance Rd.

• inside W1, W2, W5

  The farthest north combination of paths around Cameron will stay at a higher elevation requiring less fill and stay away from the flood prone areas.

• inside W2

  Object

• inside C1, C2, C4, C6, E4

  King Oaks Neighborhood includes a Nature and Wildlife Features60-Acre Preserve: A large, untouched tract of land set aside as part of the neighborhood's master design.Walking & Hiking Trails: Miles of scenic paths wind through the natural wooded terrain and native grasses.Water Sources: Includes a stocked fishing lake and additional community ponds that attract local birds and wildlife. Residents of King Oaks purchased lots and built houses based on this feature. Aside from the impact on residents (mostly retired), this proposed route would disrupt wildlife and be a direct contradiction to the charter of this neighborhood. Build the road through flood plain where nothing else can be built- not through a natural wildlife preserve and neighborhood. Have you conducted a study on what wil

• inside C1, C2, C6

  Natural Gas Transmission Line

• inside C1, C2, C6

  Natural Gas Transmission Line

• inside C1, C2, C6

  Natural Gas Transmission Line

• inside C1, C2, C6

  Natural Gas Transmission Line

• inside C1, C2, C6

  Petroleum Line

• inside C1, C2, C6

  Petroleum Line

• inside C1, C2, C6

  Petroleum Line

• inside C1, C2, C6

  Petroleum Line

• inside C1, C2, C6

  Petroleum Line

• inside C1, C2, C6

  Petroleum Line

• inside C1, C2, C6

  Petroleum Line

• inside C1, C2, C6

  Petroleum Line

• inside C1, C2, C6

  Natural Gas Transmission Line

• inside C1, C2, C6

  Natural Gas Transmission Line

• inside C1, C2, C6

  Natural Gas Transmission Line

• inside C1, C2, C6

  Natural Gas Transmission Line

• inside C1, C2, C6

  Petroleum Line

• inside C1, C2, C6

  Petroleum Line

• inside C1, C2, C6

  Petroleum Line

• inside C1, C2, C6

  Petroleum Line

• inside C1, C2, C6

  Petroleum Line

• nearest C3 · 2.5 mi

  I object

• nearest C1 · 1.5 mi

  I am submitting this comment to strongly oppose the proposed I-14 Central Conceptual Alternatives 3, 4, and 5, as well as any potential opportunity areas within the Central Opportunity Area near Snook. I moved to this area because I wanted to get away from the congestion, noise, and constant development associated with living near a major city. The rural character, quiet surroundings, and quality of life in the Snook area are exactly what attracted me here. Placing another major interstate corridor through or near this community threatens to fundamentally change that character. I am especially concerned about the impacts of putting an interstate approximately two miles from homes and rural communities. A project of this scale would bring significantly more traffic, constant road noise, con

• nearest C5 · 3.3 mi

  I-14 Corridor Study Public Comments - Round 3 Public Meetings I-14 Public Comments I-14 Public Comments: 233 List of attributes and values Comment I am submitting this comment to strongly oppose the proposed I-14 Central Conceptual Alternatives 3, 4, and 5, as well as any potential opportunity areas within the Central Opportunity Area near Snook. I moved to this area because I wanted to get away from the congestion, noise, and constant development associated with living near a major city. The rural character, quiet surroundings, and quality of life in the Snook area are exactly what attracted me here. Placing another major interstate corridor through or near this community threatens to fundamentally change that character. I am especially concerned about the impacts of putting an interstate

• nearest C3 · 6.3 mi

  No to all of it. A loop has already proven to not be necessary for the current and future traffic in the Brazos Valley, It would be a waste of taxpayer money and draw unnecessary growth to an area that is not wanted. We have farmlands and a nice community that have alot to be desired.. once you take it away it can never be undone. Texas is unique and that is why we live here.. why make it like the other places.

• nearest E3 · 1.5 mi

  I am a Grimes County resident in the Bedias area, near FM 1696 and Harrison Drive. I am very concerned about the conceptual I-14 alternative being considered through the Iola/Bedias area. The Harrison Drive/FM 1696 area contains established rural homes, families, agricultural land, and properties whose owners have invested many years in this community. As TxDOT evaluates and narrows the conceptual alternatives, I respectfully request that this residential area be specifically identified and evaluated for avoidance. Because the proposed corridors are still conceptual and intentionally broad, this is an important opportunity to select an alignment that minimizes displacement of existing residents, loss and fragmentation of private property, disruption of rural roads, noise and traffic impa

• inside C1, C2, C6

  We're heavily opposed to any development that would wipe out half of King Oaks, as the eastern proposed path for the loop might do. Put the loop on the west side of the Navasota River. And please accelerate the decision making - combined with the introduction of Terafab, this is creating years of potential uncertainty and instability for our property values if we should choose to sell. Please also consider the nearby historic cemetery and many pipelines that run through this area.

• nearest E2 · 4.3 mi

  No to it all... Our taxes will be wasted on a loop that has been proven to not be needed. It will be only to bring business and change our way of lives. It will be a burden to the current residents as they push change beyond that normal course. We moved and lived here to for the peaceful way of life and certain politicians only want to make more money without considering those that spent a lifetime paying taxes which is actually their paycheck. They need to Listen to constituents...

• nearest C6 · 1.7 mi

  I object to this

• nearest E5 · 1.0 mi

  I object to this

• nearest E5 · 1.0 mi

  I object to this

• nearest E5 · 1.0 mi

  I object to this

• nearest C6 · 1.7 mi

  I object to this

• nearest C3 · 3.0 mi

  This new study has confirmed that families—as well as rural life and, above all, wildlife—will be affected; please consider the damage that will be caused.

• nearest E5 · 1.0 mi

  I object to the I14 corridor coming close to my home. We live in the country for a reason and this has been on our family for many generations

• nearest C3 · 4.1 mi

  I am part of that growth! In my experience these projects carry long-term implications for transportation, safety and economic development which impact the character of community. My request is straightforward: that every option, every alignment and every potential impact be evaluated with diligence and must reflect responsible stewardship for my family and for others. I understand that TxDOT and its partners are exploring several routes and appreciate the public engagement and that of county leadership while honoring the values of residents. Good choices today will shape our region for a stronger Brazos County for generations to come. Thank you for providing these opportunities to foster community input.

• inside W1, W2, W5

  Homesteaded same family over 110 years. Sears kit home irreplaceable. FM 485 floods.annually. farm land and equipment entire path. Please reconsider.

• nearest C5 · 5.0 mi

  I do not wish to have a loop around College Station. Not looking for more growth opportunities.

• inside E4

  There is enough coming down Highway 30 with TerraFab. Pick a different route.

• inside C2

  The properties out in the Northern part of Bryan have already suffered loss due to development around us. Putting a major thoroughfare in the area that runs directly through our properties will strip our peace, values, and livelihoods (in some cases). We urge you to please find an alternative path that has less impact on those of us who are trying to thrive on rural land.

• nearest E4 · 0.4 mi

  The Hwy 30 option is ridiculous with Terrafab already taking over the area. None of us should have to lose our homes and way of life especially as retired teachers who have no money to up and start over. Our house is paid for and has been for some time. We have fought HSR for 10 years, now Terrafab and this. NO one should have to lose their homes, businesses, or agricultural property for these things that are unnecessary. Madisonville looks to be the more direct route, but again this should not happen here.

• inside C3, C4, C5, E1

  It would be better to use the most outer loop. The one on the East side of the Navasota river. That would be the best route for future growth in the county.

• inside C3, C4, C5

  This is ridiculous! They don’t need a loop around this side of town. No one on the east side of Bryan has trouble getting from point A to point B. This house which I’ve lived in for 5 years and my wife’s dad who lived on this land for 30+. We don’t want to lose our home to save drive time. We live in the country for a reason. We don’t want to be in town or by another interstate. We can’t buy a home like we have now with the attachments we have with the value they would value our property at and pay us. We will be losing our home that is paid off. And have to move backwards and buy a new one and go into debt

• nearest E5 · 6.4 mi

  Why not use OSR from I-45 to Benchley as the main route instead of building more roads through the rural portions of the area.? From Benchley build out 190/Hi 6 to Hearne and then use existing 190 from Hearne to Rogers. No need for an outer loop around BCS as the population density does not support the requirement.

• inside W1, W2, W4, W5

  I feel that following the west opportunity area is a better solution because there is already existing highway or route 5.

• inside W1, W2, W4, W5

  I feel that following the west opportunity area is a better solution because there is already existing highway. Route 5 would displace many of our friends and family members living along this path. some of these homesteads are over a hundred years old.

• inside W1, W2, W4, W5

  route 3

• nearest C3 · 1.8 mi

  I-14 is not wanted by Bryan residents. We do not want to look like or become a mini-Houston.

• inside C3, C5

  The proposed I214 Loop displaces us from our home of 35 years, along with the homes of many neighbours, Peach Crossing Subdivision, Peach Creek Community Center, and Peach Creek Cemetery. The loop options provided are far too close to College Station. Considering Houston's growth around 610, Beltway 8 and now 99, should a loop not circle around as far south as possible. Possibly on highways already acquired (90. 3090, 244.) With the new terafab facility and the projected growth in that area, is the original 2050 loop plan appropriate? Is a loop the only option? Can we connect and expand on current highways?

• nearest C2 · 0.2 mi

  I strongly oppose the need for this proposed highway. There has been no study showing that a loop through the rural eastern portion of Brazos County would meaningfully alleviate current or future traffic concerns. In fact, the projected traffic increases in this area appear to be minimal. This project could result in the loss of agricultural production and tax base, impacts to wildlife and potentially endangered species, disruption of rural properties, and a significant change to the quality of life of those who intentionally chose to live in this quiet, rural area. I personally moved here to live away from major roads and highways, so it is extremely frustrating to once again face a similar proposal after the East Loop was removed from consideration. This appears to be another attempt at

• inside C3, C5

  This proposed loop seems to be too close to really benefit the BCS area as it does not really route the traffic far enough outside of the city. It also is crossing land that has been in my family since 1916 and is productively used for cattle ranching and as a food source for this nation. The Peach Creek area also has a historical cemetery and the community center was built using the wood and tin from the two room school house on property deeded to Brazos County by my grandfather in 1918. Preserving history and open space property is important for the future of this nation. Consideration should be given to not only alternative routes, but better ways to preserve the land. We already have too much concrete which causes flooding in places that never before flooded and the aquafers cannot

• inside E1

  There are several cemeteries in this area, one has a Texas Historical Marker. There are many people in this area that still raise cattle. I, for one, am very concerned about food production in our country. I don't want to eat foreign or lab grown meat. The City of Iola has passed a school bond to build a very expensive new high school and the town is building a first time wastewater treatment plant. Please, find an alternate route that does not disturb historical sites and as much active agricultural land.

• nearest E3 · 4.0 mi

  Why not follow fm 39 from Iola to 30? This would have a close proximity to terrafab, and be more direct than the southern sh30 route.

• inside C3, C4, C5, C6

  Do not want!

• nearest C3 · 2.9 mi

  Do not want.

• nearest C4 · 0.8 mi

  This is a 100 year flood plain area and constructing a highway through this area would disrupt the environment, cause drainage issues and flooding, impede on neighborhoods and farmland. -Do not want/need this.

• inside C4, C6

  The I-214 Loop should be dropped from the proposed project. While the I-14 project is needed, the I-214 Loop is not.

• inside C3, C5, C6

  WE DO NOT WANT THIS. THIS IS OUR HOME

• inside C7

  Not happy about loosing the piece and quiet. We will be surrounded by noise.

• inside C3, C5, C6

  Having the route go west and south of Bryan/College Station does not seem to be the best economic route. It adds so much more distance and subsequently expense.

• nearest E5 · 31.5 mi

  This is a cemetery

• inside C3, C4, C5

  It's ridiculous that this un-needed highway run through so many houses and flood plains. If anything, which I am totally opposed to the highway overall, it shou run on the east side of the Navasota river where it would have where it would have less impact on a lot of houses and people's lives.

• inside C3, C5

  Not best option. East route is less disruptive. Peach Crossing community with young families

• nearest C3 · 0.0 mi

  This is not a good option. I don't agree with this plan.

• inside C7

  This would destroy a pecan orchard and processing facility we have spent over a decade of work and investment to develop.

• inside C3, C4, C5

  There are multiple properties in this area that are appraised at more than a million dollars. With Terrafab supposedly coming to Grimes County, it seems to make much more sense and involve considerably less expense to have the loop in this area located on the Grimes County side of the Navasota River. In addition to the expense of acquiring the Brazos County properties, much of this area is also located in the Navasota River flood plain. If there is to be a loop at all, it makes much more sense to locate this stretch near the Gibbons Creek/Terrafab area.

• nearest E4 · 0.8 mi

  With the announcement of Terafab, the largest chip manufacturing plant in the world, it only makes sense that I-14 will come along the south side of Gibbons Creek Reservoir to accommodate shipping from this major manufacturer and the ancillary industries that will grow up around Terafab. This is a shorter and more logical route for this critical east west highway.

• nearest E4 · 0.3 mi

  I strongly oppose any proposed I-14 alignment that would route this interstate through or along County Road 229. CR 229 is a rural county road surrounded by homes, farms, ranches, private property, and families who chose to live in this area because of its rural character. Placing a major interstate corridor through this community would permanently change the area and create significant impacts for the people who live and work here. An interstate in this location would bring substantially increased traffic, including heavy commercial truck traffic, along with increased noise, pollution, safety concerns, drainage and flooding concerns, and disruption to existing homes, farms, ranches, and agricultural operations. It would also require the acquisition and division of private property that fa

• nearest C2 · 0.6 mi

  We just built our home in King Oaks and have lived here only 1 year. This area was picked by my family to raise our kids in, provide some quiet and simplicity to our lives, and enjoy our neighbors and home. Putting this roadway through our neighborhood not only ruins our hardworking money that gave afforded us this dream home, but everyone else in this neighborhood's. King Oaks as a whole neighborhood provides significant property tax dollars every year for Grimes County. If the humanity in not ruining people's lives doesn't matter to you, maybe missing out on valuable tax dollars due to mowing down half of our community will. DO NOT BUILD THIS HERE!

• inside W3

  This will impact the business of this venue. Do not use Route 3. Preferred Route is Route 1. And is main source of community Marlow Water Supply Corp

• inside W3

  One of the highest points of Milam County. A beautiful area full of lovely homesite.

• inside W3, W4

  Oldest Cemetery and Settlement area in Milam County. One of the first Settlements of Milam which was one of the 23 original Land Districts of the state of Texas. Do not use Route 3 . Preferred Route 1

• nearest C2 · 0.6 mi

  Dear TxDOT Officials, We strongly oppose putting the proposed road through Kind Oaks in Iola, Texas. This route would destroy homes, displace families, divide our community, and severely damage property values. These are people’s homes and life savings, not empty land to be sacrificed for a road. We urge TxDOT to reject this route and find an alternative that does not destroy an established neighborhood. Do not tear down our homes. Do not destroy our community. Keep this road out of Kind Oaks. Please listen to the residents who will be directly affected and choose a route that protects our homes and our community. Sincerely, A Concerned Kind Oaks Resident

• nearest C2 · 0.6 mi

  These are people’s homes and livelihoods. Decades of hard work and dedication went to creating things homes. These homes are a monument representing a lifetime of dedication and dreams for a better quality of life. One highway here would destroy this.

• nearest C2 · 0.1 mi

  Do not build the road here. We do NOT WANT IT! It would ruin our home, property, investment, and community.

• inside C3, C6

  This highway would wipe out our whole property basically. It’s also wiping out thousands of people’s homes and properties that they have worked their whole lives for. Please do not put a road here. Our economy is in such bad shape and people’s pocketbooks are fragile. Making people uproot and move their whole lives could cause chaos for so many people in our community. So much of Bryan/College Station’s economy revolves around Texas A&M, but what about the people that stay during the summer and holidays because this is our home? Causing so many people to move could impact the towns economy negatively. We can’t even keep established businesses open in these towns, you think a road around the town is going to help with that? No one is going to stop in town and help stimulate our economy. Ple

• inside C2, C3, C6

  When looking at surveys of the land in this area you will find the William Henry survey. William Henry was my third Great Grandfather and was given 177 acres of land in 1837 by the Republic of Texas for his service in the Republic's army. 167 of the original 177 are still owned by family and we have houses, barns and a family cemetery on the property. Of the land owned I hold 58 acres and about 40 of those acres are in the 100 year flood plain due to Elm Creek that passes through my property. also not on our place but adjacent to us Wellborn SUD has recently drilled a new water well with two more planned to supply water into Bryan College Station. We fall in both the expanded work for Highway 6 and the area for the potential I 214 loop. Our cemetery is a designated state historical site wi

• nearest C2 · 0.3 mi

  Moved away from the noise of a toll road built in our front yard in Leander, Tx. Planning to enjoy our forever home in a quiet place, not another highway.

• nearest C2 · 0.1 mi

  This would destroy our neighborhood, we moved to college station and decided on this place to get away from highways and traffic. College Station doesn't need a loop.

• nearest C2 · 0.8 mi

  Not in support of any I-14 routes. This will destroy peoples homes, businesses, farmland and more!

• nearest C3 · 1.5 mi

  Leave our rural life alone! We moved this direction (north east Brazos County) 24 years ago to stay away from development and urban sprawl. We chose our family to be buried in Kurten Cemetery for our final resting place to be in the country that we love. If I-14 comes through here, our home and final resting spot will be consumed by the development will be consumed by what we were striving to avoid. Preserve the rural lifestyle for the generations of Brazos County residents who chose and cherish this way of life! We are Aggieland… home of Texas AGRICULTURE and Mechanical University!!

• nearest C3 · 0.8 mi

  N0 I-14 !

• inside C1, C2, C6

  With Terafab coming in push the loop out and use 244 for your loop! Terafab workers will love the proximity of it to their place of employment...NO to the loop destroying King Oaks subdivision!

• inside C3, C4, C5

  I have worked my whole life for this. It has already happened once to me. Is this what is always going to happen? The State of Texas just plans to take everything I have worked for over and over?

• inside C3, C4, C5

  My husband worked his whole life for what we have. I cannot believe the State of Texas wants to take what we have. Yet again.

• nearest C3 · 6.0 mi

  I bought this house from my deceased grandmother. She worked hard for me to be able to purchase something nice, safe, and a home after I graduated. It is so sickening the lives the State of Texas is wanting to ruin.

• inside E4

  Not along SH 30

• nearest C2 · 0.1 mi

  King Oaks is a relatively recently developed neighborhood of custom homes with a substantial number of retired owners. We all moved here to have a sense of community in a quiet rural neighborhood. My view and that of my neighbors is that the I-14/ 214 project potentially will destroy that and spoil our lives and retirement. I also wonder if this road is really needed despite paper studies. The SH30 Navasota River area widening is welcome and the rest of SH30 should be widened given Terafab's presence. That doesn't result in spoiling our neighborhoods and provides needed infrastructure.

• nearest E5 · 0.4 mi

  I own and live at 8432 Hidden Place, North Zulch, Texas 77872. One or more of the conceptual alternative routes shown for the I-14 Central Texas Corridor Study pass less than one mile from my property. I am writing to formally request that any preferred route avoid this immediate area to the greatest extent possible. Placing a full interstate-standard facility this close would create the following specific and lasting impacts: Permanent loss of rural character and privacy on residential/agricultural property that was specifically chosen for quiet country living. Significant increase in traffic noise, light, and visual intrusion that cannot be fully mitigated by typical interstate design. Potential disruption to existing access, drainage patterns, and agricultural/pasture use of the land.

• inside C7

  Farmland is being eaten up by development. High prices of land are keeping new farmers out and eminent domain is taking current farmers out. If you want to rely on imported food, you are on that trajectory. If you want food from America, don't take our farmland. We have developed a pecan orchard, the only commercial one in the Brazos County and one of the road construction options would completely take out our orchard. Pecan trees take 10 years to produce and can't be relocated. Which is more important, local food freedom or developers making a profit by buying up land near these roads? With the ever increasing cost for students to go to A&M, I think your projects are off as far as growth. A college education is becoming unaffordable and the debt accompanying it is strangling. T

• nearest E4 · 0.3 mi

  This alignment would heavily benefit tesla's future factory soon to be built at this location

• nearest C6 · 1.2 mi

  What does it mean to be inside the 1 mile line? Is a prospect of a shift in that direction? Added easments for growth?

• nearest E5 · 0.3 mi

  I own 8432 Hidden Place, North Zulch, Texas 77872. One or more of the conceptual alternative routes shown for the I-14 Central Texas Corridor Study pass less than one mile from my property. I am writing to formally request that any preferred route avoid this immediate area to the greatest extent possible. Placing a full interstate-standard facility this close would create the following specific and lasting impacts: • Permanent loss of rural character and privacy on a 12-acre residential/agricultural property that was specifically chosen for quiet country living. • Significant increase in traffic noise, light, and visual intrusion that cannot be fully mitigated by typical interstate design. • Potential disruption to existing access, drainage patterns, and agricultural/pasture use of the la

• inside W1, W2, W4

  My husband and I worked a total of 66 years, saving every way we could to buy the land we call our ranch. We lived very frugal lives because we never lost sight of our dream of retiring and having enough land to raise cattle , ride our horses. leave our children as their inheritance and garden. We bought our land in 1989 and developed our land to make that dream come to life. We not only would lose the homesite we've had for 36 years but also lose our cattle and income from the cows, which helps us to keep our cow/calf operation going. To just take away 66 years of dreaming, planning, saving, and blood sweat and tears of very hard work is totally unimaginable to me now. We have had our children and grandchildren call this home and it would be a huge devastating loss for our entire fam

• nearest C2 · 1.0 mi

  The majority of residents in King Oaks are senior and retired. They lack the physical, emotional and financial capability to be uprooted from homes they planned to live out the remainder of their lives in.

• inside C1, C2, C6

  Removing this intersection will impact 95% of King Oak residents as this this main entrance. Even if homes are not in the path of the proposed loop, we will not be able to GET to our homes from the current main entrance.

• inside C1, C2, C6

  King Oaks is a "dark skies" community with no street lights no traffic noise. With a major highway/loop right on top of our peaceful neighborhood we will have unbearable light and noise pollution. Things we intentionally saught to avoid when building in King Oaks.

• inside C1, C2, C6

  We live in a beautiful, serene neighborhood where neighbors take care of each other. Meal trains, rides to appointments, neighbors mowing each other's yard and doing home checks when others are sick, have surgeries, deaths or are out of town. Neighbors walk nature trails and stop to talk with neighbors on their front porches. We have foxes, deer, road runners, rabbits and more. Kids ride their bikes throughout the neighborhood and to the pool and pond to fish. This neighborhood is like going back in time. Even if a persons home isn't bulldozed over like you are proposing doing to mine, the neighborhood would never be the same.

• nearest C1 · 0.2 mi

  For rural Brazos County landowners, the negative impact on property value is immediate and unavoidable. Once a quiet agricultural tract becomes adjacent to interstate traffic, noise, lights, and right‑of‑way restrictions, the land’s market identity changes. What was once premium rural acreage becomes compromised frontage, and the resale market reflects that reality. Buyers looking for privacy, livestock operations, or recreational use simply won’t pay the same price for land overshadowed by an interstate corridor. The replacement‑cost problem is even worse. You can’t replace rural Brazos County land at anything close to what the state pays for right‑of‑way acquisition. Comparable acreage with similar soils, access, utilities, and location near Bryan/College Station routinely sells at a mu

• inside C1, C2, C6, E2

  Wit Tech LLC (SpaceX subsidiary) owns this lot in which their water line from the pump station down the road terminates into the Navasota river. This is their mechanism to pump water into the Gibons Creek reservoir .

• nearest E4 · 0.4 mi

  I love finding out via Facebook that you decided to change one of the routes… instead of following hwy 30 it will cut closely to my property… talking about few 100 feet. We are a veteran and first time generation rancher, and if it’s not a data center wanting to destroy the culture that built this country it’s the state. Complain about the high cost of meat and continuing to hit new lows of cattle in this state. Yall are the reason for this destruction.

• nearest E5 · 0.5 mi

  Part of the reason we bought this property was to get away from the "hustle & bustle" of city life. We love that we are close enough to major routes currently in place and yet they are not overly involved. With regard to the "East Opportunity Area" that runs concurrent to the newly designed Highway 21 route south of North Zulch, it seems to me that this is complete waste of money being spent on that project. When complete it greatly improve the traffic pattern through the northern part of Madison County. If the I14 proposal takes this route it would further disrupt an area that should already be capable of supporting traffic. There would also be no need to take or acquire further land from existing homeowners and landowners. Nor do we want the noise and light pollution that this swath of l

• inside C1, C2, C6

  Established neighborhood for country living. Concerns for noise/light pollution.

• inside C3, C5

  Environmentally sensitive area. Much wildlife would suffer. Also, there is a historic cemetery that would be greatly affected.

• inside C3, C4, C5

  Bryan College-Station is growing and we cannot ignore it. Roads in the city area are already bumper to bumper during peak times. The proposed interstate and loop will alleviate some of this congestion but if this happens, it will cost landowners their land, farms, homes, businesses, gardens, oil and gas royalties. I strongly object to the routes closer to the cities and hope you choose a path that will impact fewer of these property owners. The interstate will produce more traffic, noise, exhaust fumes and light pollution. When I grew up in Kurten, TX in the sixties, there were only twenty homes on S FM 2038 all the way to the Navasota River. That amount has increased to one hundred and includes a bank, several businesses, including a wedding venue and a veterinary clinic all which are on

• inside C3, C5

  My family and neighbors are all highly opposed to any highway corridor close enough to the Peach Creek area and Southern Pointe development off of Peach Creek Cutoff and Peach Creek Rd that could negatively impact EITHER property value OR quality of life, (e.g. noise). The East or West are much better options.

• inside C3, C5

  Within 2 miles of Hwy 6 on Peach Creek Road, there is a cemetery, 3 cattle operations, homesteads, numerous ponds and streams/creeks. The habitat supports much year-round water fowl including cranes, ducks, geese, blue heron, hawks, chapparal, and more as well as deer, fox, racoons, squirrels, opossum, armadillos,etc. There are two oil wells, a petroleum pipeline, and a large electricity easement. The area is prone to flooding over the road several times a year based on water decisions made as far away as Lake Limestone and tropical storms from the Gulf. Within 3 miles of Hwy 6, there is a housing development with zero-lot line along Peach Creek Road as well as a community center. Disruption of these rural homesteads would change the sewer needs that would then need to be provided as

• inside W3, W5

  Improved and native pecan trees in this area

• inside C1, C2, C6

  We are NOT in favor of the loop that is slated to go over my house and land. We downsized and built our retirement home here. We want the country life and to be able to hunt, fish, garden, watch birds and wildlife, and grow beautiful trees. I think I speak for many of my neighhbors in King Oaks. We are mostly retired people and do not have the ability or desire to be uprooted by this corridor.

• inside C2, C3, C4

  Still like this alignment near RELLIS.

• inside C1, C2, C4

  This seems to be a better crossing of River.

• inside E1, E2, E3

  I like this route out of the 3 for the eastern leg.

• nearest E4 · 0.7 mi

  Please don't bring I-14 on this route. Go north through Madisonville. There are too many new houses along this route. This property is valued at more than $1M on the county appraisal site. Put the freeway on raw acreage or less populated areas rather than force families out of their homes. Six of us currently live here and three additional homes will be built on this land.

• inside C3, C5

  This pathway appears to affect too many private residences in platted subdivisions.

• nearest E4 · 0.6 mi

  I am an elderly person in the care of my family members. If we are forced to move, I will not be able to find another arrangement like this where I can live in a small home on the property. I cannot afford to relocate.

• inside W3

  The West Conceptual Alternative Route 3 would disrupt many lives, irreplacable homes, farms, ranches, and natural beauty. This route is also very likely to have an ecological and enviromental impact on Little River. Additionally, the local farms and ranches are would have signifigant harm to their property and livelyhood. As many others have mentioned, this route also crosses many cemetaries which should be preserved. Lastly, this route is the most likely of the proposed routes to have costly immenint domain costs. I urge you to consider alternatives to West Conceptual Alternative Route 3

• nearest E4 · 0.7 mi

  The strip of trees through the center of this land is a creek bed and pond. Go through Madisonville with the route.

• inside W3

  There are many farms, ranches, cemeteries, homes, a river in this area and installing this highway would have a huge negative impacts to people’s lives and the environment.

• inside W2, W3, W5

  The southern route 3 makes the most sense, following existing US190 and SH36 corridors. Existing corridors minimizes state eminent domain on as much acreage as possible. Creating new corridors through farmland, ranchland, family homesteads disrupts the livlihoods of Texans, disrupts family businesses, and destroys farms that have been in families for generations. People work their entire lives to pass on and hold onto family farms, like ours, off of CR116, that would be completely wiped out by the northern route. 1. The truth is, none of the routes are necessary. These existing roads have minimal traffic on them. Fort to Port transport is handled by the railroads anyway- if the railroads have been given too much power and now the Military needs alternative transport, impose on the

• inside C4, E4

  The SH 30 causeway over the Navasota River is being rebuilt in 2027 with 12-ft lanes, 10-ft shoulders and a 16-ft median — Interstate-compatible dimensions. Central Route 4 is the only Central alternative that follows SH 30 through it. Is that avoided crossing cost being credited in the alternatives screening?

• inside W1, W2, W4

  There is a history of multiple sitings and nesting's of Falco femoralis septentrionalis

• inside W1, W2, W4

  Coniophanes imperialis and are

• inside W2

  Sitings of Tympanuchus cupido attwateri

• inside W1, W2, W4

  Confirmed nest of Tympanuchus cupido attwateri

• inside W1, W2, W4

  Active population of Leptodeira septentrionalis

• inside W1, W2, W4

  Urocyon cinereoargenteus and Vulpes vulpes can be seen daily throughout the area.

• inside W1, W2, W4

  Smilisca baudinii or Tlalocohyla smithii can be found at night .

• inside W1, W2, W4

  Large active colony of Houston Toad (Anaxyrus houstonensis /Bufo houstonensis), breeding choruses can be heard throughout the night post rain.

• nearest E2 · 3.5 mi

  Avoid going down SH 30 from Ebenezer Cemetery area to Huntville. The current track to interchange with IH 45 north of town is good. A loop around the northside of the City makes the most sense. Would like to see prairie, wetland and forest mitigation for the construction area. A new federally or state protected park on the corridor, between Ft. Hood and the State Line would work. Would like to see if dense forests can deaden sound from the interstate. Look at putting freight only lanes in the system.

• inside C2, C3, C4, C6

  With the nearly empty TX 47 and improvements planned for FM 2818 to connect to TX 6, why the need to take up all the farm land along the Brazos river flood plain?

• inside W1, W4

  Cemetery (Mexican) Watt Farm

• nearest E5 · 0.3 mi

  I own a paid-for 30-acre retirement property in North Zulch, Madison County. I bought this land specifically to live quietly in the country, close enough to existing highways to get where I need to go, but far enough that those roads would not dominate the place I chose for the rest of my life. One or more of the conceptual alternative routes now shown for the I-14 Central Texas Corridor Study pass about a mile from my property. I am asking the study team not to advance any preferred route that places a full interstate-standard facility that close to established rural homes and agricultural land in this community. An interstate that close would permanently change what this property is. It would strip the rural character and privacy that were the reason for buying here. Typical interstate d

• inside W5

  This is the favored route 5 how does that affect us. Is my property with in the proposed right off way. Why is the exact width of the corridor. Where is the centerline, pavement, frontage roads, ramp and right of way limits. What happens if divides my property into unusable property. I have my home, building other structures livestock how is all this going to be affected? How will accesss to my property be handle during and after the construction. What about noise impact during construction and after completion? What will this do to my property value? How will damages be evaluated? When will this begin? When will I be contacted if my property is indeed affected? Can you provide me with current map showing the proposed Route 5 centerline and the anticipated right of way limits one

• inside W5

  For 432 Alamo Rd, Cameron, TX 76520, ask them: Is my property within the Route 5 study corridor or within the proposed roadway alignment? What is my parcel/tract number in the I-14 study? Can you show me the exact location of the proposed Route 5 centerline in relation to my property boundaries? What is the approximate width of the potential right-of-way at my property? Is the house at 432 Alamo Rd currently within the potential right-of-way? Would the proposed highway divide my 5-acre property? Would my existing access to Alamo Road be eliminated or changed? Where would the nearest entrance/exit or frontage road be? If Route 5 is selected, when would property owners be formally notified? When would appraisals and right-of-way acquisition begin? How will TxDOT address damages to the porti

• nearest C2 · 1.2 mi

  Destroying the only residential community in this section does not make sense. Too much money for a small section of road move it to open country instead

• inside C3, C5

  Very strong concern! Light and noise polution!

Check an address against the corridors → · TxDOT's own documents